Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons During Russia-Ukraine War

Authors

  • Aneesa Abbasi Research Scholar, Department of English, Air University
  • Dr. Tehseen Zahra Assistant Professor, Department of English, Air University
  • Dr. Samina Ali Asghar Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus

Keywords:

Political cartoons, Russia-Ukraine war, Semiotics, Russian power

Abstract

Political cartoons play a vital role in analysing the truth and hidden realities. It represents the message as a whole, consisting of more than one meaning in just one image or caricature. Political cartoons are based on themes that are universal and reflect situations at the national and international level. During war situations, the conflicts between the different states are delineated by political cartoons and represent the chronological changes during the war. The Russia-Ukraine war was a major emerging conflict around the globe in the year 2022. The researcher and authors depicted the war by raising their voices in different ways. In the same way, the political cartoonist also depicted the war situation by portraying cartoons in creative and satirical ways. The present study aims to analyse the semiotic meaning generated by political cartoons on social media during the Russia-Ukraine war. Semiotic theory is used as a theoretical framework for this study. Moreover, the meanings generated by political cartoons during the Russia-Ukraine conflict are analysed using Barth’s model. The data for the semiotic analysis was taken from Tribune Content Agency. A total of 10 political cartoons are deeply analysed through the literal, denoted, and connoted meanings they show. The findings of the study show that the political cartoons reflecting the Russia-Ukraine war were mostly ironic and satirical about how Russia is using power to invade Ukraine. The findings also revealed that many political cartoonists depicted “Bear” in their cartoons, which showed how serious and persistent Russia is about destroying Ukraine. The aggression, power, pride, and egocentrism of Russia are criticised by political cartoonists.

 

Author Biographies

Aneesa Abbasi, Research Scholar, Department of English, Air University

 

 

Dr. Tehseen Zahra, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Air University

 

 

 

Dr. Samina Ali Asghar, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Education, Faisalabad Campus

 

 

References

Aazam, F., Baig, T., Azam, A., & Azam, Z. (2020). Discourse of fear and economic crisis: A multimodal analysis of Pakistani newspaper’s political cartoons of COVID-19. Linguistics and Literature Review, 6(2).

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2020). Mental model theory as a model for analysing visual and multimodal discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 303-320.

Afrin, S. (2009). Semiotic Interpretation of Bangla Ligatures: An Introduction. Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics, 2(3), 111-124.

Agarwal, N. S., Punn, N. S., & Sonbhadra, S. K. (2022). Exploring Public Opinion Dynamics on the Verge of World War III using Russia-Ukraine war-Tweets Dataset.

Al-Momani, K., Badarneh, M. A., & Migdadi, F. (2016). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons in Jordan in light of the Arab Spring. Humor, 29(4), 507-538.

Al-Momani, K., Badarneh, M. A., & Migdadi, F. (2017). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons in Jordan in light of the Arab Spring. Humor, 30(1), 63-95.

Altehenger, J. (2013). A socialist satire: Manhua Magazine and political cartoon production in the PRC, 1950–1960. Frontiers of History in China, 8(1), 78-103.

Azhar, A., Mehdi, M., Iqbal, M. Z., Shahzad, K., Arafat, Y., & Abbasi, M. G. (2021). Constructing Political Opinions: A Socio-Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons in Pakistani Print Media. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(08), 5129-5141.

Barker, B. G. (2016). Newspaper Editorial Cartoons: Where Art, Rhetoric and Metaphot Meet Reality. The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom).

Barthes, R. (1979). Éléments de sémiologie (1964). Frankfurt am Main.

Becker, A. B. (2022). Does gender matter? Comic hosts, audience reception, and the processing of political satire content. Psychology of Popular Media.

Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books/Doubleday.

Bowcher, W. L. (2018). The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics, 5(1), 1-19.

Danjoux, I. (2018). Reading cartoons. In Political cartoons and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (pp. 20-43). Manchester University Press.

El Refaie, E. (2016). Analysing metaphors in multimodal texts. In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 166-180). Routledge.

Genova, D. I. (2018). Grasping political cartoons? Not an easy matter. The European Journal of humor Research, 6(1), 85-99.

Gibbs Jr, R. W. (Ed.). (2016). Mixing metaphor (Vol. 6). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Conflict in Ukraine | Global Conflict Tracker. (2023). https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine Retrieved on 3rd March 2023.

Gordon, J. C. (1990). International political cartoons as rhetoric: a content analysis. The Ohio State University.

Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: a review of current research. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761-770.

Ines Puspita, S. (2022). A Semiotic Study of Denotative and Connotative Meaning in the Movie" Beauty And The Beast"(2017) (Doctoral dissertation, Unsada).

Khamdamovna, M. U. (2020). Similarities and Differences between types of Comics. International Journal on Integrated Education, 3(9), 105-107.

Knopf, C. M. (2015). The Comic Art of War: A Critical Study of Military Cartoons, 1805-2014, with a Guide to Artists. McFarland.

Kull, K. (2019). Steps towards the natural meronomy and taxonomy of semiosis: Emon between index and symbol?. Sign Systems Studies, 47(1/2), 88-104.

Kuttner, P. J., Sousanis, N., & Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2017). How to draw comics the scholarly way. Handbook of arts-based research, 396-422.

Lacity, M., & Rudramuniyaiah, P. S. (2009). Funny business: Public opinion of outsourcing and offshoring as reflected in US and Indian political cartoons. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 13.

Leak, A. N. (1994). Barthes: mythologies (pp. 1-82). Grant and Cutler.

Logan, S. A. (2015). The semantics of social constructivism. Synthese, 192(8), 2577-2598.

Mateus, S. (2016). Political cartoons as communicative weapons: the hypothesis of the “Double Standard Thesis” in three Portuguese cartoons. Estudos em Comunicação, 23, 195-221.

McClennen, S. A. (2018). The Joke is on You. Political humor in a changing media landscape: A new generation of research, 137.

Meidani, M. (2015). Holocaust cartoons as ideographs: Visual and rhetorical analysis of holocaust cartoons. SAGE Open, 5(3), 2158244015597727.

Mhamdi, C. A. (2017). The use of political cartoons during popular protests: the case of the 2011 Tunisia uprising. Journal of English Studies, 15, 193-220.

Mhamdi, C. A. (2017). The use of political cartoons during popular protests: the case of the 2011 Tunisia uprising. Journal of English Studies, 15, 193-220.

Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Using logic models. Handbook of practical program evaluation, 62.

Pacheco, A. L. (2021). A Multimodal Semiotic Analysis of Cartoons on the US and Russian Relations under the Barack Obama and Donald Trump Administrations (Doctoral dissertation).

Pedrazzini, A., & Scheuer, N. (2018). Distinguishing cartoon subgenres based on a multicultural contemporary corpus. The European Journal of humor Research, 6(1), 100-123.

Peirce, C. S. (1977). Semiotics and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (C. Hardwick, Ed.). Indiana University Press

Pogrebetskaya, M., & Bause, G. S. (2018). An Allied Anesthetic?: De Preissac's Political Cartoon of Hitler's Surgery. Journal of Anesthesia History, 4(4), 233-234.

Political Cartoons, (2022). Retrieved 30 November 2022, from https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/political-cartoons/index.html

Rudrakumar, S., & Venkatraman, R. (2022). A semiotic analysis of Saussure and Barthes's theories under the purview of print advertisements. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 18(1).

Sanderson, M. (2016). Continuing Conversations: The Image of Richard Nixon in Political Cartoons.

Sani, I., Abdullah, M. H., Ali, A. M., & Abdullah, F. S. (2014). Political Cartoons in the First Decade of the Millennium. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22(1).

Seo, H. J., & Huh, Y. J. (2018). Analysis of Interrelation between Image and Text as Fusion Relationship-Through Advertising Production Class. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(7), 155-162.

Shaikh, N. Z., Tariq, R., & Saqlain, N. U. S. (2019). Cartoon war….. A political dilemma! A semiotic analysis of political cartoons. Journal of Media Studies, 31(1).

Silaški, N., & ?urovi?, T. (2019). The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context & Media, 31, 100318.

Ukraine in maps: Tracking the war with Russia. (2022). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60506682 (30th November 2022)

Vinson, J. C. (2014). Thomas Nast: political cartoonist. University of Georgia Press.

Zhabotynska, S., & Ryzhova, O. (2022). Ukraine and the West in pro-Russia Chinese media: A methodology for the analysis of multimodal political narratives. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (24), 115-139.

?ywiczy?ski, P., Wacewicz, S., & Sibierska, M. (2018). Defining pantomime for language evolution research. Topoi, 37(2), 307-318.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Abbasi, A., Zahra, D. T., & Asghar, D. S. A. (2022). Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons During Russia-Ukraine War. Pakistan Journal of Language Studies, 6(1), 16-41. Retrieved from //pjls.gcuf.edu.pk/index.php/pjls/article/view/157